Home | Publications | Books | Bénéficiaires ou partenaires : Quel rôle pour les populations dans l’action humanitaire (Beneficiaries or partners : the role of local populations in humanitarian (...)

The Groupe URD Review

Methods and tools

Quality & Accountability COMPAS Quality & Accountability COMPAS
CHS Core Humanitarian Standard (CHS)
Pictogrammme Sigmah Sigmah Software
Pictogrammme Reaching Resilience

Reaching Resilience
Pictogrammme brochure Environnement Training
Pictogrammme brochure Participation Handbook
Pictogrammme globe terrestre The Quality Mission
Pictogrammme PRECIS Humatem PRECIS Method

Bénéficiaires ou partenaires : Quel rôle pour les populations dans l’action humanitaire (Beneficiaries or partners : the role of local populations in humanitarian action)
François Grünewald, Claire Pirotte, Karthala, Paris, 2005

During a crisis, from the initial turbulence to the grey areas that follow, there is a need for both emergency relief and reconstruction, the need to look ahead and think in terms of development. What forms of dialogue, consultation and participation do NGOs, international organisations and local authorities engage in with the beneficiaries of aid at the different stages of a crisis. ?

This was the question at the heart of the Global Study on Participation and Consultation of Affected Populations in Humanitarian Action, which was instigated by ALNAP, (Active Learning Network for Accountability and Performance in Humanitarian Action) Groupe URD ran this project for two years, studying six crises of a different nature in three continents.

Though ALNAP members all believe in the right of crisis-affected people to give their opinion about the actions that affect them, questions remain about ‘how’, ‘when’ and ‘with whom’ paricipatory practices should be used. The debate around the issue of participation in humanitarian action has never moved beyond theories and good intentions. There has never been a clear definition of what participation means and there has never been a clear idea of the level of participation which should be expected. This document is an attempt to analyse the current state of participation. It is not a condensed summary of general recommendations which have still to be validated by the other members of the network. It is a compilation of six case studies each of which raises a number of questions.

The cases of Angola, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Guinea, Sierra Leone, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan and Colombia represent a variety of different contexts (culture, conflict history and humanitarian response). The many different ways in which beneficiaries participated throughout these crises are presented to encourage reflection amongst international aid actors.